Monofloral honeys and health

GHO_monofloral honeys health

Monofloral honeys represent a unique category of natural products with distinct physicochemical properties and bioactive compounds that vary according to their botanical origin and geographical provenance. Recent scientific evidence has demonstrated that these honeys possess significant therapeutic potential, including antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer activities (Mărgăoan et al., 2021). The increasing interest in natural medicines and functional foods has prompted extensive research into the chemical composition and health benefits of monofloral honeys from diverse floral sources worldwide.

Methodology

The comprehensive review conducted by Mărgăoan et al. (2021) employed a systematic literature search spanning publications from 1999 to 2021, utilising databases including Google Scholar, PubMed, and ScienceDirect. The research team focused on identifying and analysing relevant articles concerning mineral content, phenolic compounds, and medicinal properties of monofloral honeys.

The methodology excluded natural or polyfloral honeys with unknown botanical species, concentrating exclusively on authenticated monofloral varieties. Analytical techniques employed in the reviewed studies included high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), mass spectrometry (MS), and various spectrophotometric assays for determining total phenolic content (TPC) and total flavonoid content (TFC).

Physicochemical characteristics and mineral composition

The investigation revealed substantial variations in physicochemical parameters amongst monofloral honeys from different geographical regions. Moisture content typically ranged between 11.59% and 23%, with most samples complying with international standards (Codex Alimentarius, 2001). Notable exceptions included certain Turkish Calluna honey samples (20.86%) and Portuguese Erica varieties (17.31–20.60%), which exhibited slightly elevated moisture levels (Mărgăoan et al., 2021). The fructose-to-glucose ratio varied considerably, with heather honey displaying values as high as 1.80, while pine honey ranged between 1.17 and 4.0, reflecting the significant influence of botanical source on sugar composition.

Mineral analysis demonstrated that potassium represented the predominant mineral element, accounting for approximately 80% of total mineral content across most samples. Portuguese honeys exhibited potassium concentrations averaging 1,150.1 mg/kg, whilst calcium, magnesium, and sodium were present in varying proportions depending on geographical origin (Alves et al., 2013). Turkish pine honey samples demonstrated particularly high potassium levels (1,832–1,989 mg/kg), alongside elevated magnesium (54.2–59.2 mg/kg) and calcium content (50.1–59.9 mg/kg) (Can et al., 2015). These mineral profiles serve as valuable indicators for honey authentication and geographical discrimination.

Phenolic compounds and chemical markers

The review identified numerous phenolic compounds characteristic of specific monofloral honeys, establishing valuable chemical markers for authentication purposes. Manuka honey (Leptospermum scoparium) demonstrated distinctive compounds including 2-methoxybenzoic acid and trimethoxybenzoic acid, whilst Kanuka honey was characterised by 4-methoxyphenylacetic acid (Stephens et al., 2010). Sage honey (Salvia officinalis) exhibited unique markers such as resveratrol, epigallocatechin, and pinostrobin, compounds rarely found in other honey varieties (Gašić et al., 2015). Ziziphus honey contained distinctive monoterpenoids including carvacrol and thymol, providing unambiguous identification markers (Badjah Hadj Ahmed et al., 2014).

Flavonoid content varied substantially amongst honey types, with Portuguese strawberry tree and heather honeys displaying the highest levels (21.16 mg quercetin equivalents/100 g), while sunflower honey exhibited considerably lower concentrations (1.93 mg/100 g) (Aazza et al., 2013). The total phenolic content ranged from 2.0 mg gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/100 g in Romanian black locust honey to 1,288.0 mg GAE/100 g in New Zealand Manuka honey, reflecting substantial variations in antioxidant capacity (Mărgăoan et al., 2021). These polyphenolic profiles demonstrated strong correlations with antioxidant activity, as measured through DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl), FRAP (ferric reducing antioxidant power), and ABTS (2,2′-azino-bis(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)) assays.

Antioxidant activity and biological properties

In vitro studies demonstrated that monofloral honeys possess significant antioxidant properties correlating with their phenolic composition. Buckwheat honey exhibited particularly robust antioxidant activity, with DPPH values of 1.2 mmol Trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity (TEAC)/kg and FRAP measurements reaching 5.7 mmol Fe(II)/kg (Kus et al., 2014). Malaysian Tualang honey demonstrated superior radical scavenging activity compared to other local varieties, with DPPH IC₅₀ values of 9.65 mg ascorbic acid equivalents/100 g and FRAP values of 52.39 mg Trolox equivalents/100 g (Kishore et al., 2011). The research established that strawberry tree honey from Portugal exhibited the highest total phenolic content amongst European varieties, correlating with enhanced protective effects against thermal cholesterol degradation (Rosa et al., 2011).

In vivo studies and therapeutic applications

Animal studies provided compelling evidence for the therapeutic potential of monofloral honeys. Tualang honey administration (1.0 g/kg body weight) in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats significantly reduced fasting plasma glucose levels, increased body weight gain, and enhanced antioxidant enzyme activities including catalase (CAT), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), glutathione reductase (GR), and glutathione-S-transferase (GST) (Omotayo et al., 2010). Turkish pine honey (1 g/kg body weight/day) effectively decreased malondialdehyde (MDA) and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels in liver, kidney, heart, and brain tissues of mice exposed to trichlorfon toxicity (Eraslan et al., 2010).

Weight management studies revealed that honey consumption, particularly clover, acacia, and gelam honeys, significantly reduced excess weight gain and adiposity in high-fat diet-induced obese rats. These honeys decreased triglyceride levels by 29.6% compared to sucrose-fed controls, whilst simultaneously improving serum lipid profiles (Nemoseck et al., 2011; Samat et al., 2017). Malicia honey (Mimosa quadrivalvis) demonstrated hepatoprotective effects, reducing low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels in dyslipidaemic rats, whilst increasing beneficial intestinal bacteria and organic acid production (Bezerra et al., 2018).

Anticancer and antiproliferative effects

In vitro anticancer studies demonstrated that monofloral honeys exhibit significant antiproliferative activity against various cancer cell lines. Manuka honey at concentrations as low as 0.6% (w/v) inhibited proliferation of murine melanoma (B16.F1), colorectal carcinoma (CT26), and human breast cancer (MCF-7) cells through apoptosis induction (Fernandez-Cabezudo et al., 2013). Chrysin, a natural flavone constituent of acacia honey, demonstrated antiproliferative effects in human (A375) and murine (B16-F1) melanoma cell lines by inducing alterations in cell cycle progression (Pichichero et al., 2010). Caffeic acid, a phenolic compound abundant in kelulut honey, proved to be a significant candidate for colon cancer chemoprevention, inhibiting HCT-15 cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner (Jaganathan, 2012).

Tualang honey exhibited remarkable apoptotic effects, inducing 51.2% apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells after 48 hours, whilst achieving 55.6% and 56.2% apoptosis in MCF-7 and HeLa cells respectively after 72 hours (Fauzi et al., 2011). The mechanism involved mitochondrial membrane potential disruption and activation of intrinsic apoptotic pathways. Italian strawberry tree honey (Arbutus unedo) demonstrated potent cytotoxic effects against human colon adenocarcinoma (HCT-116) and metastatic (LoVo) cancer cells, with concentrations of 3–12 mg/mL and 10–40 mg/mL respectively inducing significant reactive oxygen species generation and upregulation of pro-apoptotic markers including p53, caspase-3, -8, -9, and Bax (Afrin et al., 2017, 2019).

Antimicrobial and wound healing properties

Antimicrobial efficacy varied substantially amongst monofloral honeys, with methylglyoxal-rich Manuka honey demonstrating superior antibacterial activity against both Gram-positive and Gram-negative pathogens. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of Hovenia and acacia honeys against Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella typhimurium ranged between 25–50% (w/v), while concentrations of 25% (w/v) proved effective against Staphylococcus aureus and Listeria monocytogenes (Park et al., 2020). Forest honey from Slovakia exhibited antimicrobial activity comparable to Manuka honey against certain bacterial strains, demonstrating particular efficacy against Proteus species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Majtan & Majtan, 2010).

Wound healing studies revealed that chestnut honey pre-treatment (2 g/kg) for seven consecutive days effectively prevented indomethacin-induced gastric lesions in rats, reducing ulcer index, microvascular permeability, and myeloperoxidase activity (Nasuti et al., 2006). The gastroprotective mechanisms involved antioxidant activity, anti-inflammatory effects, and enhancement of mucosal defence systems. Cornflower honey (Centaurea cyanus) demonstrated both antibacterial properties and wound healing promotion, with DPPH IC₅₀ values of 44.40 mg/mL and FRAP IC₅₀ values of 3.85 mg/mL (Kus et al., 2014).

Clinical implications and human studies

Human clinical trials investigating monofloral honeys remain limited but demonstrate promising therapeutic potential. A study involving 38 type 2 diabetic patients treated exclusively with honey (2 g/kg/day) for periods ranging from 0.42 to 13.5 years demonstrated prevention of ketoacidosis, hyperosmolar hyperglycaemic state, and macrovascular complications, particularly coronary heart disease, whilst maintaining stable random blood glucose levels (Abdulrhman, 2016). Kanuka honey supplementation (53.5 g daily) in combination with cinnamon, chromium, and magnesium for 40 days in type 2 diabetic patients resulted in significant weight reduction, decreased blood pressure, and improved blood lipid profiles (Whitfield et al., 2016).

Paediatric studies demonstrated that clover honey administration (0.5 mL/kg body weight/day) in type 1 diabetic children aged 4–18 years over 12 weeks significantly reduced fasting serum glucose, glycosylated haemoglobin, subscapular skinfold thickness, total cholesterol, and LDL levels, whilst increasing fasting and postprandial C-peptide concentrations (Abdulrhman et al., 2013). These findings suggest potential adjunct therapeutic applications in diabetes management, although further large-scale randomised controlled trials are warranted to establish definitive clinical protocols.

Discussion and conclusions

The comprehensive analysis conducted by Mărgăoan et al. (2021) establishes that monofloral honeys represent complex natural matrices containing diverse bioactive compounds with significant therapeutic potential. The botanical origin fundamentally determines the chemical composition, with specific phenolic markers enabling accurate authentication and quality assessment. Geographical provenance further influences mineral content and physicochemical properties, reflecting variations in soil composition, climate, and environmental conditions.

The antioxidant properties of monofloral honeys, mediated primarily through polyphenolic compounds, demonstrate significant protective effects against oxidative stress in both in vitro and in vivo models. The capacity to modulate antioxidant enzyme systems, reduce lipid peroxidation, and enhance cellular defence mechanisms positions these natural products as potential functional foods with disease-preventive properties. The demonstrated anticancer activities, particularly the ability to induce apoptosis and inhibit proliferation in various cancer cell lines, warrant further investigation through well-designed clinical trials to establish therapeutic efficacy and optimal dosing regimens.

The antimicrobial properties of monofloral honeys, particularly varieties with high methylglyoxal content such as Manuka honey, offer potential alternatives to conventional antibiotics, addressing the growing challenge of antimicrobial resistance. The multifactorial mechanisms underlying these effects, including osmotic pressure, hydrogen peroxide generation, low pH, and specific phenolic compounds, provide synergistic antibacterial activity. Wound healing applications demonstrate particular promise, with several honey varieties exhibiting gastroprotective effects, anti-inflammatory properties, and enhanced tissue regeneration.

However, several limitations require acknowledgement. The majority of studies employed in vitro methodologies or animal models, with relatively few well-controlled human clinical trials. The optimal therapeutic dosages, treatment durations, and potential adverse effects in clinical populations remain inadequately characterised. Furthermore, standardisation of honey products for medical applications requires rigorous quality control, including verification of botanical origin, absence of contaminants, and consistent bioactive compound content. The potential for environmental pollutants and pesticide residues necessitates comprehensive testing protocols for honeys intended for therapeutic use.

Future research should prioritise randomised controlled trials investigating specific monofloral honeys for defined clinical indications, including wound management, metabolic disorders, and adjunct cancer therapy. Mechanistic studies elucidating the molecular pathways underlying observed therapeutic effects will facilitate rational application and optimisation of treatment protocols. Investigation of synergistic effects between honey constituents and conventional therapeutics may identify novel combination strategies enhancing therapeutic efficacy whilst minimising adverse effects. The development of standardised, medical-grade honey products will facilitate clinical adoption and regulatory approval.

In conclusion, monofloral honeys represent promising natural therapeutic agents with diverse biological activities supported by substantial scientific evidence. The unique combination of nutritional value, antioxidant properties, antimicrobial efficacy, and potential anticancer activities positions these products as valuable functional foods and complementary medicines. However, translation from laboratory findings to clinical applications requires rigorous evaluation through well-designed trials, establishment of quality standards, and development of evidence-based therapeutic protocols. The growing interest in apitherapy and natural product medicine, coupled with increasing scientific validation, suggests an expanding role for monofloral honeys in integrative healthcare approaches.

Dario Dongo

References

  • Aazza, S., Lyoussi, B., Antunes, D., & Miguel, M. G. (2013). Physicochemical characterization and antioxidant activity of commercial Portuguese honeys. Journal of Food Science, 78(9), C1159–C1165. https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.12201
  • Abdulrhman, M. M., El-Hefnawy, M. H., Aly, R. H., Shatla, R. H., Mamdouh, R., Mahmoud, D. M., & Mohamed, W. S. (2013). Metabolic effects of honey in type 1 diabetes mellitus: A randomized crossover pilot study. Journal of Medicinal Food, 16(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1089/jmf.2012.0108
  • Afrin, S., Forbes-Hernández, T. Y., Gasparrini, M., Bompadre, S., Quiles, J. L., Sanna, G., Spano, N., Giampieri, F., & Battino, M. (2017). Strawberry-tree honey induces growth inhibition of human colon cancer cells and increases ROS generation: A comparison with Manuka honey. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(3), 613. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18030613
  • Afrin, S., Forbes-Hernández, T. Y., Cianciosi, D., Pistollato, F., Zhang, J., Pacetti, M., Amici, A., Reboredo-Rodriguez, P., Simal-Gandara, J., Bompadre, S., Quiles, J. L., Giampieri, F., & Battino, M. (2019). Strawberry tree honey as a new potential functional food. Part 2: Strawberry tree honey increases ROS generation by suppressing Nrf2-ARE and NF-κB signaling pathways and decreases metabolic phenotypes and metastatic activity in colon cancer cells. Journal of Functional Foods, 57, 477–487. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jff.2019.04.037
  • Alves, A., Ramos, A., Gonçalves, M. M., Bernardo, M., & Mendes, B. (2013). Antioxidant activity, quality parameters and mineral content of Portuguese monofloral honeys. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 30(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2013.02.009
  • Badjah Hadj Ahmed, A. Y., Obbed, M. S., Wabaidur, S. M., AlOthman, Z. A., & Al-Shaalan, N. H. (2014). High-performance liquid chromatography analysis of phenolic acid, flavonoid, and phenol contents in various natural Yemeni honeys using multi-walled carbon nanotubes as a solid-phase extraction adsorbent. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62(24), 5443–5450. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf5011758
  • Bezerra M. L. R., de Souza E. L., de Sousa J. M. B., dos Santos Lima M. D. S., Alves A. F., Almeida M. d. G., Coutinho Alves R., Veríssimo de Araújo E., Soares N. L., da Silva G. A., Magnani M. & de Souza Aquino J. (2018). Effects of honey from Mimosa quadrivalvis L. (malícia) produced by the Melipona subnitida D. (jandaíra) stingless bee on dyslipidaemic rats. Food & Function, 9, 4480–4492. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8FO01044G
  • Can, Z., Yildiz, O., Sahin, H., Turumtay, E. A., Silici, S., & Kolayli, S. (2015). An investigation of Turkish honeys: Their physico-chemical properties, antioxidant capacities and phenolic profiles. Food Chemistry, 180, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.02.024
  • Codex Alimentarius Commission. (2001). Revised Codex standard for honey (Codex Standard 12–1981, Rev. 2). Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, 24th Session, Rome, Italy.
  • Eraslan, G., Kanbur, M., Silici, S., & Karabacak, M. (2010). Beneficial effect of pine honey on trichlorfon induced some biochemical alterations in mice. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 73(5), 1084–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2010.02.017
  • Fauzi, A. N., Norazmi, M. N., & Yaacob, N. S. (2011). Tualang honey induces apoptosis and disrupts the mitochondrial membrane potential of human breast and cervical cancer cell lines. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 49(4), 871–878. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.12.010
  • Fernandez-Cabezudo, M. J., El-Kharrag, R., Torab, F., Bashir, G., George, J. A., El-Taji, H., & Al-Ramadi, B. K. (2013). Intravenous administration of Manuka honey inhibits tumor growth and improves host survival when used in combination with chemotherapy in a melanoma mouse model. PLoS ONE, 8(2), e55993. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0055993
  • Gašić, U. M., Natić, M. M., Mišić, D. M., Lušić, D. V., Milojković-Opsenica, D. M., Tešić, Ž. L., & Lušić, D. (2015). Chemical markers for the authentication of unifloral Salvia officinalis L. honey. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 44, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfca.2015.08.008
  • Jaganathan, S. K. (2012). Growth inhibition by caffeic acid, one of the phenolic constituents of honey, in HCT 15 colon cancer cells. The Scientific World Journal, 2012, 372345. https://doi.org/10.1100/2012/372345
  • Kishore, R. K., Halim, A. S., Syazana, M. N., & Sirajudeen, K. N. S. (2011). Tualang honey has higher phenolic content and greater radical scavenging activity compared with other honey sources. Nutrition Research, 31(4), 322–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2011.03.001
  • Kus, P. M., Congiu, F., Teper, D., Sroka, Z., Jerković, I., & Tuberoso, C. I. G. (2014). Antioxidant activity, color characteristics, total phenol content and general HPLC fingerprints of six Polish unifloral honey types. LWT – Food Science and Technology, 55(1), 124–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2013.09.016
  • Mărgăoan, R., Topal, E., Balkanska, R., Yücel, B., Oravecz, T., Cornea-Cipcigan, M., & Vodnar, D. C. (2021). Monofloral honeys as a potential source of natural antioxidants, minerals and medicine. Antioxidants, 10(7), 1023. https://doi.org/10.3390/antiox10071023
  • Nasuti, C., Gabbianelli, R., Falcioni, G., & Cantalamessa, F. (2006). Antioxidative and gastroprotective activities of anti-inflammatory formulations derived from chestnut honey in rats. Nutrition Research, 26(3), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2006.02.007
  • Nemoseck, T. M., Carmody, E. G., Furchner-Evanson, A., Gleason, M., Li, A., Potter, H., Rezende, L. M., Lane, K. J., & Kern, M. (2011). Honey promotes lower weight gain, adiposity, and triglycerides than sucrose in rats. Nutrition research (New York, N.Y.), 31(1), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nutres.2010.11.002
  • Omotayo, E. O., Gurtu, S., Sulaiman, S. A., Wahab, M. S. A., Sirajudeen, K. N. S., & Salleh, M. S. M. (2010). Hypoglycemic and antioxidant effects of honey supplementation in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. International Journal for Vitamin and Nutrition Research, 80(1), 74–82. https://doi.org/10.1024/0300-9831/a000008
  • Park, S. H., Kim, Y. K., Kim, M. S., & Lee, S. H. (2020). Antioxidant and antibacterial properties of Hovenia (Hovenia dulcis) monofloral honey produced in South Korea. Food Science of Animal Resources, 40(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.5851/kosfa.2020.e6
  • Pichichero, E., Cicconi, R., Mattei, M., Muzi, M. G., & Canini, A. (2010). Acacia honey and chrysin reduce proliferation of melanoma cells through alterations in cell cycle progression. International journal of oncology, 37(4), 973–981. https://doi.org/10.3892/ijo_00000748
  • Rosa, A., Tuberoso, C. I. G., Atzeri, A., Melis, M. P., Bifulco, E., & Dessì, M. A. (2011). Antioxidant profile of strawberry tree honey and its marker homogentisic acid in several models of oxidative stress. Food Chemistry, 129(3), 1045–1053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.05.072
  • Samat, S., Kanyan Enchang, F., Nor Hussein, F., & Wan Ismail, W. I. (2017). Four-week consumption of Malaysian honey reduces excess weight gain and improves obesity-related parameters in high fat diet induced obese rats. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 2017, 1342150. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1342150
  • Stephens, J. M., Schlothauer, R. C., Morris, B. D., Yang, D., Fearnley, L., Greenwood, D. R., & Loomes, K. M. (2010). Phenolic compounds and methylglyoxal in some New Zealand Manuka and Kanuka honeys. Food Chemistry, 120(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.074
  • Whitfield, P., Parry-Strong, A., Walsh, E., Weatherall, M., & Krebs, J. D. (2016). The effect of a cinnamon-, chromium- and magnesium-formulated honey on glycaemic control, weight loss and lipid parameters in type 2 diabetes: An open-label cross-over randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Nutrition, 55(3), 1123–1131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-015-0926-x

Similar Posts